Hello, my name is Fanny. Now, I am going to present the methodology and results of the article. So, the article’s methodology is based on a literature synthesis. The authors used data from major United Kingdom audits, specifically N-A-P three and N-A-P five, as well as clinical guidelines and case reports. These sources allowed them to gather reliable statistics about anaesthetic complications in obstetrics. Here are some of the main results: Post-dural puncture headache affects up to forty percent of women after an accidental puncture. The risk of nerve injury is estimated between zero point two and one point two per one hundred thousand cases. Pain during caesarean section is the leading cause of litigation in obstetric anaesthesia. Awareness under general anaesthesia occurs in about one in six hundred and seventy cases. Failed intubation is more frequent in obstetrics; around one in three hundred cases. However, the authors also mention several limitations: They did not collect new data; it is purely a review. The results are United Kingdom–centric, without international comparison. Despite these limitations, the study provides a clear and practical picture of the main risks encountered in obstetric anaesthesia. Now, I will hand over to Thilo, who will share his analysis and interpretation of the article.