Fish Audioによる無料のElon Musk AI音声ジェネレーター

You know, sometimes people don't understand what we're trying to build here. They call me crazy, reckless, whatever. But look, I'm just trying to push humanity forward. Maybe I'm wrong sometimes, but at least I'm trying. That's more than most critics can say.

Look at electric vehicles, I mean, it's pretty obvious. We're converting chemical energy to kinetic energy at about 90% efficiency. No complex transmission system needed, just motors and batteries. It's fundamentally better than combustion engines, just physics really.

So we've got these new solar panels that are actually pretty incredible, they're about 30% more efficient than traditional ones, and they're integrating with our AI systems to optimize energy capture throughout the day, which is going to be really important for sustainable cities.

Look, the fundamental problem is that we need to make life multi-planetary. It's not about just building rockets, it's about ensuring the long-term survival of consciousness. Mars is hard, but it's the critical backup drive for humanity.

Look, the probability of Mars colonization succeeding is maybe 70%, and yeah, some people might die in the process. That's just reality. But the alternative is humanity staying on one planet forever, which is definitely not optimal for species survival.

Look, the thing about Mars colonization is, it's going to be incredibly difficult, probably dangerous, but it's essential for making humanity multiplanetary. We might fail a few times, but that's fine - we'll iterate, improve the design, and eventually make it work.

I think, well, the future of consciousness really depends on us becoming a multi-planetary species. It's about extending the light of humanity beyond Earth. If we can make life multi-planetary, it’s essentially like an insurance policy for the future of civilization as we know it.

Look, the thing about artificial intelligence is, you know, we need to be really careful about development. It's not just about making it work, it's about making it work safely. And, you can't just, you know, suppress discussion about the risks. That's fundamentally anti-intellectual.